3

I have declared and initialized a constant char array within a class:

class grid {
    const char test[11] = {'s', 'e', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9'};

My code works, but I keep getting compiler warnings:

non static data member initializers only available with C++11

and

extended initializer lists only available with C++11

I know that this isn't an issue because I'm compiling to C++11 standard, but I'm curious as to what is pre C++11 about my code.

I am hoping someone can give me some insight and suggest what I can do to make this code C++98 "friendly".

Also as requested, my compiler command:

> g++ -o test main.cpp
8
  • 2
    Did you add -std=c++11 to the compiler command line? Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 19:04
  • 1
    it is [Enabled By Default] in the warning Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 19:05
  • 1
    To be C++98 "friendly" as you call it, don't initialise your class data members in the class declaration; do that in the class constructor instead. Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 19:06
  • 3
    Enabled by default means the warning is enabled by default, it doesn't have anything to do with -std=c++11. This warning shouldn't be appearing if you have C++11 mode enabled. C++03 only allows in class initialization of constant integral static data members. You're using a C++11 feature called non-static data member initializer. Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 19:08
  • 3
    You can't initialize arrays in the constructor in C++98, though. Unless you call assigning to elements initializing. Commented Jun 24, 2014 at 19:18

2 Answers 2

2

To make it C++98 compatible, you need to initialize non-static class constants outside of the class declaration.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

2

You need do compile with -std=c++11 (for gcc and clang). If you do not do this, your program is checked vs. the old C++98 standard to ensure compatibility with old compilers.

So it allows you to use C++11 features without the flag, but warns you so that you don't do it on accident.

Further explanation:

Your code compiles fine because it is legal code and the compiler can compile it. The compiler omits a warning to make you aware of the fact that you used a C++11 feature because many people (like my University, sadly) still use outdated compiler like gcc4.6 that do not have full C++11 support yet. That means that these people might not be able to compile your code, which you might care about (if e.g. your professor needs to compile your assignment).

With the -std=c++11 flag you tell the compiler "This is a C++11 program, meant to be compiled with C++11 compliant compilers". Thus, the warning becomes redundant.

2 Comments

As in the question, I am aware that compiling it with c++11 would fix the issue. I'm more interested and how and why it is happening.
@Rhys Edited, hope that helps.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.