575

Attempting a flexbox nav that has up to 5 items and as little as 3, but it's not dividing the width equally between all the elements.

Fiddle

The tutorial I'm modeling this after is http://www.sitepoint.com/responsive-fluid-width-variable-item-navigation-css/

* {
  font-size: 16px;
}

.tabs {
  max-width: 1010px;
  width: 100%;
  height: 5rem;
  border-bottom: solid 1px grey;
  margin: 0 0 0 6.5rem;
  display: table;
  table-layout: fixed;
}
.tabs ul {
  margin: 0;
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: row;
}
.tabs ul li {
  flex-grow: 1;
  list-style: none;
  text-align: center;
  font-size: 1.313rem;
  background: blue;
  color: white;
  height: inherit;
  left: auto;
  vertical-align: top;
  text-align: left;
  padding: 20px 20px 20px 70px;
  border-top-left-radius: 20px;
  border: solid 1px blue;
  cursor: pointer;
}
.tabs ul li.active {
  background: white;
  color: blue;
}
.tabs ul li:before {
  content: "";
}
<div class="tabs">
  <ul>
    <li class="active" data-tab="1">Pizza</li>
    <li data-tab="2">Chicken Noodle Soup</li>
    <li data-tab="3">Peanut Butter</li>
    <li data-tab="4">Fish</li>
  </ul>
</div>

3

6 Answers 6

1355

There is an important bit that is not mentioned in the article to which you linked and that is flex-basis. By default flex-basis is auto.

From the spec:

If the specified flex-basis is auto, the used flex basis is the value of the flex item’s main size property. (This can itself be the keyword auto, which sizes the flex item based on its contents.)

Each flex item has a flex-basis which is sort of like its initial size. Then from there, any remaining free space is distributed proportionally (based on flex-grow) among the items. With auto, that basis is the contents size (or defined size with width, etc.). As a result, items with bigger text within are being given more space overall in your example.

If you want your elements to be completely even, you can set flex-basis: 0. This will set the flex basis to 0 and then any remaining space (which will be all space since all basises are 0) will be proportionally distributed based on flex-grow.

li {
    flex-grow: 1;
    flex-basis: 0;
    /* ... */
}

This diagram from the spec does a pretty good job of illustrating the point.

And here is a working example with your fiddle.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

10 Comments

This ruins wrapping for me on Safari.
The awesome thing about this answer is that you explain flex-basis with this example better than anywhere else on literally the entire internet. I'm going to contact MIT about giving you an honorary professorship.
Just to mention that flex: 1; is shorthand for combination of flex-grow: 1, flex-basis: 0.
you will also probably need to reset min width to zero (min-width: 0), because for flex it is auto by default and it won't allow properly sizing in some cases.
min-width: 0 was absolutely key to make it work for me
|
58

As explained in @James Montagne answer flex-basis: 0 will ensure the flexbox columns are distributed evenly which works in this case since the column content can wrap and isn't forcing the width. However, in cases where the width of the column content is forced (for example with image width or white-space: nowrap), the solution is to set min-width: 0...

li {
  flex-grow: 1;
  flex-basis: 0;
  min-width: 0;
}

https://codeply.com/p/sLZxZRFduI

4 Comments

min-width: 0; made my items same width to achieve overflow
Excellent answer to deal with multiple flex columns containing images and text. min-width:0; helped to solve equal column widths
I dont need flex-bias 0 with min-width set.
I just went with the flex-basis: 0 and that worked for me. Thanks!
24

To create elements with equal width using Flex, you should set to your's child (flex elements):

flex-basis: 25%;
flex-grow: 0;

It will give to all elements in row 25% width. They will not grow and go one by one.

3 Comments

This is pretty awkward since it diminishes the benefit of flex entirely. If youre going to hardcode your column sizes theres easier ways to solve things.
that's not wrong at all .. if you wanna have boxes with same length and breaken down when row is fully occupied .. you can easily achieve that like this. Maybe set also min-width if you need a min width
@Kloar You're saying that like it's the only benefit of flexboxes... They can certainly still be beneficial when you need equal widths, e.g. for responsiveness. Also, it's not like flexboxes aren't easy?
14

Solution:

flex: 1;

OR

.flex-child-items{
   flex-grow: 1;
} 

Explanation:

If you only put display: flex it just horizontally align all the item and the width is going to be sum of child's width (depend on the content or sometimes width property).

For example:

// A normal flex

++++++++++   ++++++++++   ++++++++++
+        +   +        +   +        +
+   A    +   +   B    +   +   C    +
+  10px  +   +  10px  +   +  10px  +
+        +   +        +   +        +
++++++++++   ++++++++++   ++++++++++

Now suppose you want to divide space equally to all of them. To do this add flex-grow: 1 to all children of flex. (In this example A,B and C)

.A, .B, .C {
    flex-grow: 1;
}

After this it looks like this:

++++++++++                              ++++++++++                              ++++++++++
+        +                              +        +                              +        +
+   A    +                              +   B    +                              +   C    +
+  10px  +                              +  10px  +                              +  10px  +
+        +                              +        +                              +        +
++++++++++                              ++++++++++                              ++++++++++

*BTW, if the above example box does not look like center, sorry for that but code work try it on the project.

1 Comment

Upvoted for flex: 1. I like your commitment to visualize but see if you can change it to a snippet instead =)
9

To understand why setting the flex-grow property doesn't distribute items equally in a flex container, we need to delve into the inner workings of the flex algorithm and understand how flex-grow operates.

  1. Default Behavior of display:flex:

When you set a container to display:flex, it defaults to flex-direction:row, and its flex items will have widths based on their content. In this scenario, the larger the content of an item, the wider it becomes. The padding and flex-grow have been removed from your code to show this behavior:

After removing those declarations from .tabs ul li:{...}:

flex-grow: 1;
padding: 20px 20px 20px 70px;

Code after removing padding and flex-grow properties

* {
  font-size: 16px;
}

.tabs {
  max-width: 1010px;
  width: 100%;
  height: 5rem;
  border-bottom: solid 1px grey;
  margin: 0 0 0 6.5rem;
  display: table;
  table-layout: fixed;
}
.tabs ul {
  margin: 0;
  display: flex;
  flex-direction: row;
}
.tabs ul li {
/*   flex-grow: 1; */
  list-style: none;
  text-align: center;
  font-size: 1.313rem;
  background: blue;
  color: white;
  height: inherit;
  left: auto;
  vertical-align: top;
  text-align: left;
/*   padding: 20px 20px 20px 70px; */
  border-top-left-radius: 20px;
  border: solid 1px blue;
  cursor: pointer;
}
.tabs ul li.active {
  background: white;
  color: blue;
}
.tabs ul li:before {
  content: "";
}
<div class="tabs">
  <ul>
    <li class="active" data-tab="1">Pizza</li>
    <li data-tab="2">Chicken Noodle Soup</li>
    <li data-tab="3">Peanut Butter</li>
    <li data-tab="4">Fish</li>
  </ul>
</div>

2. The Role of flex-grow: Applying flex-grow to a flex item instructs the item to expand when there's available space within the container.

3. Equal Distribution with flex-grow:1: If we set all items to flex-grow:1, like in your example, they will proportionally share the remaining space equally. However, it's essential to note that initially, they are not of equal width. The additional space is added to the initial width of each item (the content width).

Here's how it looks when we return back flex-grow:1:

Note that the right space after each flex item is equal but the width of items are not equal due to different content sizes After adding flex-grow:1; again

4. Solving the Unequal Width Issue: To achieve truly equal distribution, you can set the width of the items to 0 this will make the space available to be utilized by flex-grow and here how it looks: enter image description here

Note that the blue rectangle is the border of all the items

Now we have all available space to be distributed by flex-grow and we can divide them evenly among flex items.

Alternatively, you can use the flex-basis property to ensure equal distribution. Setting flex-basis:0 produces a similar result. Another option is to use the shorthand property flex, where flex:1 is equivalent to flex-grow:1, flex-shrink:1, and flex-basis:0.

and both options achieve the same result:

width:0 or flex:1

and here is the result after we add back the padding: after adding the padding again

It's worth mentioning that the flex algorithm has a way of determining the initial width (in the case of flex-direction:row) and height (in the case of flex-direction:column) using flex-basis that can override the width or height property if it exists. To avoid potential bugs, it is recommended to use it or the shorthand flex property to ensure consistent and predictable behavior.

In summary, to ensure equal distribution of space among flex items, you can use flex-basis:0 or flex:1 with default values, while keeping in mind the nuances of the flex algorithm. This approach ensures that items in a flex container are divided equally and consistently, regardless of their initial content-based widths.

Comments

0

Flex may not give equal widths to children in all cases.

use css grid for equal width elements.

.el{
 display: grid;
 grid-auto-flow: column;
 grid-auto-columns: 1fr
}

Reference https://css-tricks.com/equal-columns-with-flexbox-its-more-complicated-than-you-might-think/

If you wish to use CSS flex only, then there are few options

  1. flex-basis: 100% to all the childs, this will be a close match. OR
  2. flex-basis: 0 this is less useful than first option

1 Comment

Not sure why this has been downvoted but it's the right answer for me at least so thank you

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.