16

I have multi loops in together and a sleep in the most inner loop. for example:

from time import sleep

for i in range(10):
    print i,
    for j in range(-5,5):
        if j > 0:
            print '.',
        else:
            print 'D',
        sleep(1)
    print ''

if you run the code, you may expected to get i value after it D sleep 1 second and another D and again sleep until to the end.

but the result is difference, it waits 10 seconds and prints the whole line of 0 D D D D D D . . . . and waiting again to printing next line.

I found the comma at the end of printing causes this problem. How can I solve it?

2
  • what output do you expect, it prints a new line on each iteration for me Commented Aug 18, 2014 at 17:29
  • every j iterate? it prints on every i iteration but I need prints on every j Commented Aug 18, 2014 at 17:31

3 Answers 3

17

Because of existence of comma, the output buffers until a \n.

You should flush the stdout after every print or use sys.stdout.write and flush buffer.

Define your print method:

import sys

def my_print(text):
    sys.stdout.write(str(text))
    sys.stdout.flush()

and at the end of line print a \n

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

it did not work with me, I tried flushing the output but nothing happens
3

The problem using print <something>, is buffering and printing only when the result is ready to be printed.

You can solve it using print_function from __future__ (which will be in compliance with Python 3 as well):

from __future__ import print_function
from time import sleep
import sys

for i in range(10):
    print(i, end='')
    for j in range(-5,5):
        if j > 0:
            print('.', end='')
        else:
            print('D', end='')
        sys.stdout.flush()
        sleep(1)            
    print('')

3 Comments

You still need a sys.stdout.flush() to make it look like it's printing incrementally. If using Python 3.3+, then supplying a flush=True to print is also available.
@JonClements thanks I wasn't aware of it since it works fine without the flush in python 2.7.5
It's sys.stdout that does the buffering. Using print() as a function does not change the buffering behaviour, but you can use flush=True in newer Python versions to force a flush. Use sys.stdout.flush() on versions where the flush argument is not available (like Python 2).
0

I would suggest override print just after import with below coe

import sys
def print_msg(*args,end='\n'):
    for item in args:
        sys.stdout.write(str(item)+' ')
    sys.stdout.write(end)
    sys.stdout.flush()

print = print_msg

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.