170

I want to sort a list of strings based on the string length. I tried to use sort as follows, but it doesn't seem to give me correct result.

xs = ['dddd','a','bb','ccc']
print xs
xs.sort(lambda x,y: len(x) < len(y))
print xs

['dddd', 'a', 'bb', 'ccc']
['dddd', 'a', 'bb', 'ccc']

What might be wrong?

8 Answers 8

274

When you pass a lambda to sort, you need to return an integer, not a boolean. So your code should instead read as follows:

xs.sort(lambda x,y: cmp(len(x), len(y)))

Note that cmp is a builtin function such that cmp(x, y) returns -1 if x is less than y, 0 if x is equal to y, and 1 if x is greater than y.

Of course, you can instead use the key parameter:

xs.sort(key=lambda s: len(s))

This tells the sort method to order based on whatever the key function returns.

EDIT: Thanks to balpha and Ruslan below for pointing out that you can just pass len directly as the key parameter to the function, thus eliminating the need for a lambda:

xs.sort(key=len)

And as Ruslan points out below, you can also use the built-in sorted function rather than the list.sort method, which creates a new list rather than sorting the existing one in-place:

print(sorted(xs, key=len))
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

No need for the lambda; just use key = len
This will sort in Ascending Order(Smaller length of words at top), to sort in Descending Order(Smaller Length of words at bottom) add a parameter reverse=True
The xs.sort() throws "TypeError: sort() takes no positional arguments". Instead it should be xs.sort(key=lambda x: len(x))
123

The same as in Eli's answer - just using a shorter form, because you can skip a lambda part here.

Creating new list:

>>> xs = ['dddd','a','bb','ccc']
>>> sorted(xs, key=len)
['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']

In-place sorting:

>>> xs.sort(key=len)
>>> xs
['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']

3 Comments

How do I reverse sort on length?
@user2922935 : You can do xs[::-1] to reverse the already sorted list. Check out Dan Bader's article here : dbader.org/blog/python-reverse-list
xs.sort(key=len, reverse=True)
9

The easiest way to do this is:

list.sort(key = lambda x:len(x))

Comments

5

I Would like to add how the pythonic key function works while sorting :

Decorate-Sort-Undecorate Design Pattern :

Python’s support for a key function when sorting is implemented using what is known as the decorate-sort-undecorate design pattern.

It proceeds in 3 steps:

  1. Each element of the list is temporarily replaced with a “decorated” version that includes the result of the key function applied to the element.

  2. The list is sorted based upon the natural order of the keys.

  3. The decorated elements are replaced by the original elements.

Key parameter to specify a function to be called on each list element prior to making comparisons. docs

Comments

2

Write a function lensort to sort a list of strings based on length.

def lensort(a):
    n = len(a)
    for i in range(n):
        for j in range(i+1,n):
            if len(a[i]) > len(a[j]):
                temp = a[i]
                a[i] = a[j]
                a[j] = temp
    return a
print lensort(["hello","bye","good"])

Comments

0

I can do it using below two methods, using function

def lensort(x):
    list1 = []
    for i in x:
        list1.append([len(i),i])
    return sorted(list1)

lista = ['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']
a=lensort(lista)
print([l[1] for l in a])

In one Liner using Lambda, as below, a already answered above.

 lista = ['a', 'bb', 'ccc', 'dddd']
 lista.sort(key = lambda x:len(x))
 print(lista)

Comments

-1
def lensort(list_1):
    list_2=[];list_3=[]
for i in list_1:
    list_2.append([i,len(i)])
list_2.sort(key = lambda x : x[1])
for i in list_2:
    list_3.append(i[0])
return list_3

This works for me!

Comments

-2
def swap_pos(lst):
    for i in range(len(lst)):
        for j in range(0, i):
            if len(lst[j]) < len(lst[i]):
                lst.insert(j, lst[i])
                lst.pop(i + 1)
                break

    print(lst)

swap_pos(technology)

1 Comment

Please don't post code-only answers; instead, explain why your answer works. See How to Answer for more information on how to write a good answer.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.