Is there an easier way to persist an object to db when using angular-meteor?

Question

I really like meteor-angular, however, in the following code snippet, I think there is still friction when persisting changes back to the db. For example, in this code sample:

saveParty(name: string, description: string) {
        Parties.update(this.selectedParty._id, {$set: {name: name, description: description}});
    }

it is going to difficult to manually type "name: name, description: description" if there were a large number of fields.

Is it possible to do something like (kind of like what breezsjs does):

saveParty() {
        Parties.save(this.selectedParty);
    }

or better yet:

 saveParty() {
            this.selectedParty.Save();
        }

Urigo · Accepted Answer · 2015-07-09 01:30:11Z

1

Yes :) Take a look at AngularMeteorCollection methods here - http://angular-meteor.com/api/AngularMeteorCollection#methods

AngularMeteorObject methods here - http://angular-meteor.com/api/AngularMeteorObject and

And the examples at the bottom

answered Jul 9, 2015 at 1:30

Urigo

3,18523 silver badges27 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Is there an easier way to persist an object to db when using angular-meteor?

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related