38

I have a class with numerous Nullable<T> properties which I want to be serializable to XML as attributes. This is apparently a no-no as they are considered 'complex types'. So, instead I implement the *Specified pattern, where I create an addition *Value and *Specified property as follows:

[XmlIgnore]
public int? Age
{
    get { return this.age; }
    set { this.age = value; }
}

[XmlAttribute("Age")]
public int AgeValue
{
    get { return this.age.Value; }
    set { this.age = value; }
}

[XmlIgnore]
public bool AgeValueSpecified
{
    get { return this.age.HasValue; }
}

Which works fine - if the 'Age' property has a value, it is serialized as an attribute. If it doesn't have a value, it isn't serialized.

The problem is that, as I mentioned, a have a lot of Nullable-s in my class and this pattern is just making things messy and unmanageable.

I'm hoping there is a way to make Nullable more XmlSerializer friendly. Or, failing that, a way to create a Nullable replacement which is.

Does anyone have any ideas how I could do this?

Thanks.

2 Answers 2

22

I had a similar problem with some code I was working on, and I decided just to use a string for the property I was serializing and deserializing. I ended up with something like this:

[XmlAttribute("Age")]
public string Age
{
    get 
    { 
        if (this.age.HasValue)
            return this.age.Value.ToString(); 
        else
            return null;
    }
    set 
    { 
        if (value != null)
            this.age = int.Parse(value);
        else
            this.age = null;
    }
}

[XmlIgnore]
public int? age;
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

Is this still the best solution for nullable properties?
13

Implement the IXmlSerializable interface on your class. You can then handle special cases such as nullables in the ReadXML and WriteXML methods. There's a good example in the MSDN documentation page..

 
class YourClass : IXmlSerializable
{
    public int? Age
    {
        get { return this.age; }
        set { this.age = value; }
    }

    //OTHER CLASS STUFF//

    #region IXmlSerializable members
    public void WriteXml (XmlWriter writer)
    {
        if( Age != null )
        {
            writer.WriteValue( Age )
        }
    }

    public void ReadXml (XmlReader reader)
    {
        Age = reader.ReadValue();
    }

    public XmlSchema GetSchema()
    {
        return(null);
    }
    #endregion
}

2 Comments

I guess this will have to do - it'd be nice to be able to tell a 'complex' type to serialize as an attribute.
If you have many properties but only one nullable doesn't this mean manually serializing every property? Is there a good way to do it for just nullable properties? The Proxy property in the answer from @Curt does this but I am thinking an attribute decorator must exist?

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.