5

Is there a way to make the something like the following code work?

add = lambda n: (yield n) or add(n+1)

(answers don't need to be in functional style)

1
  • 10
    What do you expect that to do? Commented Jul 18, 2010 at 19:40

3 Answers 3

3
def add(n):
    yield n
    for m in add(n+1):
        yield m

With recursive generators it's easy to build elaborate backtrackers:

def resolve(db, goals, cut_parent=0):
    try:
        head, tail = goals[0], goals[1:]
    except IndexError:
        yield {}
        return
    try:
        predicate = (
            deepcopy(clause)
                for clause in db[head.name]
                    if len(clause) == len(head)
        )
    except KeyError:
        return
    trail = []
    for clause in predicate:
        try:
            unify(head, clause, trail)
            for each in resolve(db, clause.body, cut_parent + 1):
                for each in resolve(db, tail, cut_parent):
                    yield head.subst
        except UnificationFailed:
            continue
        except Cut, cut:
            if cut.parent == cut_parent:
                raise
            break
        finally:
            restore(trail)
    else:
        if is_cut(head):
            raise Cut(cut_parent)

...

for substitutions in resolve(db, query):
    print substitutions

This is a Prolog engine implemented by a recursive generator. db is a dict representing a Prolog database of facts and rules. unify() is the unification function that creates all substitutions for the current goal and appends the changes to the trail, so they can be undone later. restore() does the undoing, and is_cut() tests if the current goal is a '!', so that we can do branch pruning.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

The add example given doesn't have a termination condition. Did you intend that?
3

I'm not sure of the intent of "yield(n) or add(n+1)", but recursive generators are certainly possible. You might want to read the link below to get a grip on what's possible, in particular the section titled "Recursive Generators".

Comments

0

Your function seems to me just to be other expression for unbound sequence:

n, n+1, n+2,....

def add(x):
    while True:
        yield x
        x+=1

for index in add(5):
    if not index<100: break ## do equivalent of range(5,100)
    print(index)

This is not recursive, but I see no need for recursive style here.

The recursive version based on the other answers link, which had generators calling generators, but not recursively:

from __future__ import generators

def range_from(n):
    yield n
    for i in range_from(n+1):
        yield i

for i in range_from(5):
    if not i<100: break ## until 100 (not including)
    print i

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.