12

My C# method needs to be invoked from C++

Originally my C# method takes a parameter of type double[], but when calling from C++ it becomes a SAFEARRAY

In C++ I need to take data from an array of doubles, and populate a SAFEARRAY. I have not found any sample code to do this.

Any help is appreciated

3 Answers 3

27

Following is the code to create a safearray in C++.

#include<oaidl.h>

void CreateSafeArray(SAFEARRAY** saData)        
{
    double data[10]; // some sample data to write into the created safearray
    SAFEARRAYBOUND  Bound;
    Bound.lLbound   = 0;
    Bound.cElements = 10;

    *saData = SafeArrayCreate(VT_R8, 1, &Bound);

    double HUGEP *pdFreq;
    HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(*saData, (void HUGEP* FAR*)&pdFreq);
    if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
    {
            // copy sample values from data[] to this safearray
        for (DWORD i = 0; i < 10; i++)
        {
            *pdFreq++ = data[i];
        }
        SafeArrayUnaccessData(*saData);
    }
}

Free the pointer when you are finished like the following code-

  SAFEARRAY* saData;
  CreateSafeArray(&saData); // Create the safe array
  // use the safearray
  ...
  ...

  // Call the SafeArrayDestroy to destroy the safearray 
  SafeArrayDestroy(saData);
  saData = NULL; // set the pointer to NULL

If you use ATL for C++, then better use CComSafeArray declared in "atlsafe.h". This is wrapper for SAFEARRAY. CComSafeArray Class

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

This article helped me much. Thanks. But using the function like this left me with an empty saData-Pointer.
@Teetrinker - saData will be empty after SafeArrayDestroy is called. I have added some comments to the my code.
Thanks, just what I needed. But the HUGEP and FAR macros are just noise now when everything is 32 or 64 bit.
9

Continuing on @Liton's answer, I want to stress his last sentence, i.e. ATL's CComSafeArray. It really can save you a lot of typing. CComSafeArray has C++ constructors, destructors, operator overloads including one for [ ] that gives you an read / write reference to any element in the SAFEARRAY. In short, you can really focus on your business logic and needn't worry about the SAFEARRAY plumbing:

#include <atlbase.h>
#include <atlsafe.h>
// ...

    CComSafeArray<double> arr(10);
    arr[0] = 2.0;
    arr[1] = 3.0;
    arr[2] = 5.0;
    // ...

At the very least, even if you're not going to use CComSafeArray it's worthwhile to deconstruct its source code in <atlsafe.h> giving you better insight on the what, when, why and how on SAFEARRAY functions.

Comments

2

Passing SAFEARRAYs is not recommended. It is recommended to place the SAFEARRAY into a VARIANT. Further, the SAFEARRAY should hold VARIANT data. This gives the best of all worlds and makes passing VARIANT SAFEARRAY of VARIANTs more useful to other languages. E.g. C++ to VB / C# (Note it is up to the caller to free/destroy the SAFEARRAY)

Building on the previous code

// A VARIANT holding a SAFEARRAY of VARIANTs
VARIANT vRet;

SAFEARRAYBOUND Bound;
Bound.lLbound = 0;
Bound.cElements = 10;

SAFEARRAY * psaData = SafeArrayCreate(VT_VARIANT, 1, &Bound);

VARIANT HUGEP * pData = NULL;
HRESULT hr = SafeArrayAccessData(psaData, (void HUGEP * FAR *)&pData);
if (SUCCEEDED(hr))
{
    for (short i = 0; i < 10; ++i,++pData)
    {
        ::VariantInit(pData);
        pData->vt = VT_I2;
        pData->iVal = i;
    }

    SafeArrayUnaccessData(psaData);
}

vRet.vt = VT_ARRAY | VT_VARIANT;
vRet.parray = psaData;

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.