Note: The following is for Java 8, using the Nashorn engine.
First, to make the code compile, remove the .value from the println() statement. obj is declared to be type Object, and Object doesn't have a value field.
Once you do that, you get the following exception when running the code:
Exception in thread "main" javax.script.ScriptException: <eval>:1:25 Invalid return statement
var obj = { value: 1 }; return obj;
^ in <eval> at line number 1 at column number 25
That is because you don't have a function, so you cannot call return. The return value of the script is the value of the last expression, so just say obj.
Now it will run and print [object Object]. To see what type of object you got back, change to println(obj.getClass().getName()). That will print jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.ScriptObjectMirror. I've linked to the javadoc for your convenience.
ScriptObjectMirror implements Bindings which in turn implements Map<String, Object>, so you can call get("value").
Working code is:
import javax.script.*;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws ScriptException {
ScriptEngine engine = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("js");
Bindings obj = (Bindings)engine.eval("var obj = { value: 1 }; obj; ");
Integer value = (Integer)obj.get("value");
System.out.println(value); // prints: 1
}
}
UPDATE
The whole point was to create an object with functions, is that possible with this engine? There isn't a Function object.
Example for how to do that:
import javax.script.ScriptEngine;
import javax.script.ScriptEngineManager;
import jdk.nashorn.api.scripting.ScriptObjectMirror;
public class Test {
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
String script = "var f = {\n" +
" value: 0,\n" +
" add: function(n) {\n" +
" this.value += n;\n" +
" return this.value;\n" +
" }\n" +
"};\n" +
"f; // return object to Java\n";
ScriptEngine engine = new ScriptEngineManager().getEngineByName("js");
ScriptObjectMirror obj = (ScriptObjectMirror)engine.eval(script);
System.out.println("obj.value = " + obj.getMember("value"));
System.out.println("obj.add(5): " + obj.callMember("add", 5));
System.out.println("obj.add(-3): " + obj.callMember("add", -3));
System.out.println("obj.value = " + obj.getMember("value"));
}
}
OUTPUT
obj.value = 0
obj.add(5): 5.0
obj.add(-3): 2.0
obj.value = 2.0
return obj;? Return statements should be in functions, but then I don't know how that class evaluates the JS code.varstatement, which won't return the object itself. Just the object wrapped in parentheses may work. The parens will be necessary for a valid program.println()statement), not a runtime error. See my answer for why.var obj = { value: 1 };nor{ value: 1 };would likely work because neither statement alone produces an object, while({value: 1})would.