Scala mock function with implicit generic types

Question

I'm trying to mock Cassandra ScalaGettableData object using scalamock. I need to mock the following method:

def getMap[K : TypeConverter, V : TypeConverter](name: String) = get[Map[K, V]](name)

TypeConverter is a Trait and has implicit implementations such as:

implicit object StringConverter extends TypeConverter[String]

In my code I'm calling

scalaGettableData.getMap[String, String]("myMap")

and I guess it's implicitly converted to

scalaGettableData.getMap[StringConverter, StringConverter]("myMap")

My Test code is as following :

val cassandraRow1 = mock[ScalaGettableData]
(cassandraRow1.getMap[String, String] _).expects("localizations_config").returning(Map("key1" -> "value1"))`

But I'm getting compilation error:

Error:(28, 26) _ must follow method; cannot follow (name: String)(implicit evidence$3: com.datastax.spark.connector.types.TypeConverter[String], implicit evidence$4: com.datastax.spark.connector.types.TypeConverter[String])Map[String,String] <and> (index: Int)(implicit evidence$3: com.datastax.spark.connector.types.TypeConverter[String], implicit evidence$4: com.datastax.spark.connector.types.TypeConverter[String])Map[String,String]

How am I supposed to mock this method ?

Take a look at stackoverflow.com/a/2983376/411944 on how context bounds work. — Reactormonk
– Reactormonk, Commented Nov 28, 2016 at 12:41

Philipp · Accepted Answer · 2017-03-05 08:52:51Z

6

Maybe this example helps:

"implicit parameters" should "be mockable" in {
  trait Bar[T]
  trait Foo {
    def getMap[K : Bar](name: String): Int
  }

  val m = mock[Foo]
  (m.getMap[Long](_: String)(_: Bar[Long])) expects(*, *) returning 42 once()

  implicit val b = new Bar[Long] {}
  m.getMap("bar")
}

Effectively, the type parameter K : Bar gets converted by the Scala compiler to a second parameter list, which is mocked out explicitely in this example with (_: Bar[Long]).

edited Mar 5, 2017 at 8:52

answered Mar 5, 2017 at 8:21

Philipp

9876 silver badges16 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Regular Jo Over a year ago

While this answer may solve the problem, you can improve the quality of your answer by explaining why or how the code works. Sort of a teach a man to fish thing.

Regular Jo Over a year ago

:) Have 10 points. When replying to someone besides the author of the exact post (question or answer), make sure to tag them like @Username, there's even an auto-complete of participating users.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Scala mock function with implicit generic types

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related