2

I am working on a client side communication with a SOAP web services using .NET Core (latest version at the moment 1.1.) and C# (actually Omnisharp). Requests should be digitally signed with an enveloped signature, using RSA-SHA1 signing method, ending up with structure like this:

<soap:Envelope> 
  <soap:Body> 
    <MyRootElement>
      <MyData>
          ...
      </MyData> 
     <Signature xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#">
       <SignedInfo>
         <CanonicalizationMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315"/>
         <SignatureMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#rsa-sha1"/>
         <Reference URI="#G0xcabf5080-4D">
           <Transforms>
             <Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#enveloped-signature"/>
             <Transform Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xml-c14n-20010315"/>
           </Transforms>
           <DigestMethod Algorithm="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#sha1"/>
           <DigestValue>4j9JKFMvg6Mmfx7ERu8R3WkZTtQ=</DigestValue>
         </Reference>
       </SignedInfo>
       <SignatureValue>....</SignatureValue>
       <KeyInfo>
         <X509Data>
           <X509Certificate>....</X509Certificate> 
           <X509IssuerSerial>
             <X509IssuerName>...</X509IssuerName>
             <X509SerialNumber>72672627</X509SerialNumber>
           </X509IssuerSerial>
         </X509Data>
       </KeyInfo>
     </Signature>
   </MyRootElement>
  </soap:Body>
</soap:Envelope>

All documentation I was able to find refer to using SignedXml class that is not available in .NET Core. Does anyone have suggestion or link to share how can I make this signature (and required canonicalization) without SignedXml class? Or maybe there is some unofficial version of SignedXml that I am not aware of?

1 Answer 1

2

SignedXml is in the tree at https://github.com/dotnet/corefx and presumably will be available with the upcoming 2.0 release (as a nuget package, not the shared framework bundle).

It has a lot of dependencies on 2.0 types, so it would be difficult to try to port it back to 1.1; but maybe you could carve it down to your specific needs.

Or, try with the 2.0 preview release and see if things just work.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.