Java converting int to hex and back again

int val = -32768;
String hex = Integer.toHexString(val);

int parsedResult = (int) Long.parseLong(hex, 16);
System.out.println(parsedResult);

That's how you can do it.

The reason why it doesn't work your way: Integer.parseInt takes a signed int, while toHexString produces an unsigned result. So if you insert something higher than 0x7FFFFFF, an error will be thrown automatically. If you parse it as long instead, it will still be signed. But when you cast it back to int, it will overflow to the correct value.

• int to Hex :

  Integer.toHexString(intValue);
  

• Hex to int :

  Integer.valueOf(hexString, 16).intValue();
  

You may also want to use long instead of int (if the value does not fit the int bounds):

• Hex to long:

  Long.valueOf(hexString, 16).longValue()
  

• long to Hex

  Long.toHexString(longValue)
  

It's worth mentioning that Java 8 has the methods Integer.parseUnsignedInt and Long.parseUnsignedLong that does what you wanted, specifically:

Integer.parseUnsignedInt("ffff8000",16) == -32768

The name is a bit confusing, as it parses a signed integer from a hex string, but it does the work.

Try using BigInteger class, it works.

int Val=-32768;
String Hex=Integer.toHexString(Val);

//int FirstAttempt=Integer.parseInt(Hex,16); // Error "Invalid Int"
//int SecondAttempt=Integer.decode("0x"+Hex);  // Error "Invalid Int"
BigInteger i = new BigInteger(Hex,16);
System.out.println(i.intValue());

As Integer.toHexString(byte/integer) is not working when you are trying to convert signed bytes like UTF-16 decoded characters you have to use:

Integer.toString(byte/integer, 16);

or

String.format("%02X", byte/integer);

reverse you can use

Integer.parseInt(hexString, 16);

Java's parseInt method is actally a bunch of code eating "false" hex : if you want to translate -32768, you should convert the absolute value into hex, then prepend the string with '-'.

There is a sample of Integer.java file :

public static int parseInt(String s, int radix)

The description is quite explicit :

* Parses the string argument as a signed integer in the radix 
* specified by the second argument. The characters in the string 
...
...
* parseInt("0", 10) returns 0
* parseInt("473", 10) returns 473
* parseInt("-0", 10) returns 0
* parseInt("-FF", 16) returns -255

Using Integer.toHexString(...) is a good answer. But personally prefer to use String.format(...).

Try this sample as a test.

byte[] values = new byte[64];
Arrays.fill(values, (byte)8);  //Fills array with 8 just for test
String valuesStr = "";
for(int i = 0; i < values.length; i++)
    valuesStr += String.format("0x%02x", values[i] & 0xff) + " ";
valuesStr.trim();

Below code would work:

int a=-32768;
String a1=Integer.toHexString(a);
int parsedResult=(int)Long.parseLong(a1,16);
System.out.println("Parsed Value is " +parsedResult);

Hehe, curious. I think this is an "intentianal bug", so to speak.

The underlying reason is how the Integer class is written. Basically, parseInt is "optimized" for positive numbers. When it parses the string, it builds the result cumulatively, but negated. Then it flips the sign of the end-result.

Example:

66 = 0x42

parsed like:

4*(-1) = -4
-4 * 16 = -64 (hex 4 parsed)

-64 - 2 = -66 (hex 2 parsed)

return -66 * (-1) = 66

Now, let's look at your example FFFF8000

16*(-1) = -16 (first F parsed)
-16*16 = -256 

-256 - 16 = -272 (second F parsed)
-272 * 16 = -4352 

-4352 - 16 = -4368 (third F parsed)
-4352 * 16 = -69888

-69888 - 16 = -69904 (forth F parsed)
-69904 * 16 = -1118464 

-1118464 - 8 = -1118472 (8 parsed)
-1118464 * 16 = -17895552 

-17895552 - 0 = -17895552 (first 0 parsed)
Here it blows up since -17895552 < -Integer.MAX_VALUE / 16 (-134217728). 
Attempting to execute the next logical step in the chain (-17895552 * 16)
would cause an integer overflow error.

Edit (addition): in order for the parseInt() to work "consistently" for -Integer.MAX_VALUE <= n <= Integer.MAX_VALUE, they would have had to implement logic to "rotate" when reaching -Integer.MAX_VALUE in the cumulative result, starting over at the max-end of the integer range and continuing downwards from there. Why they did not do this, one would have to ask Josh Bloch or whoever implemented it in the first place. It might just be an optimization.

However,

Hex=Integer.toHexString(Integer.MAX_VALUE);
System.out.println(Hex);
System.out.println(Integer.parseInt(Hex.toUpperCase(), 16));

works just fine, for just this reason. In the sourcee for Integer you can find this comment.

// Accumulating negatively avoids surprises near MAX_VALUE

public String toHex(int num) {
    if (num == 0)
        return "0";

    char[] hexChars = "0123456789abcdef".toCharArray();
    StringBuilder hex = new StringBuilder();

    while (num != 0 && hex.length() < 8) {
        hex.insert(0, hexChars[num & 15]);
        num >>>= 4;
    }

    return hex.toString();
}