meta/dynamic/generic programming in ruby

Question

I am trying to make a generic method:

class Foo
  attr_reader

  def add(object)
    item = @item.find { |item| item.(#the method is calling object.class) == object if item.is_a?(object.class)}
  end
end

I want to create a generic method which compares the element of an array depending the parameter class.

Example:

item.method1 == method1 if item.is_a?(method1.class)

where method1 is the name of class.

Also, I need a complete tutorial about metaprogramming and dynamic/generic programming.

For meta programming try pragprog.com/titles/ppmetr/metaprogramming-ruby — blu
– blu, Commented Mar 23, 2011 at 16:12

Aaa · Accepted Answer · 2011-03-29 00:33:45Z

I am unsure of what you are trying to do from your example. As a general rule, in Ruby, you don't check for types. It is dynamically typed for a reason: you can write code that works for any objects that happen to support the methods your code calls on them.

From what I can tell from your comments, you want to extend the class Array so, when you call a method on an array like an_array.pack, the array is searched for an instance of Pack and returned. Ruby has a method called whenever a method is found not to exist called Module#method_missing. For example, if I randomly decide to call 4.to_dragon(magic: 4, height: 700), the Ruby interpreter will attempt to find to_dragon as a public method defined on some class or module in the Fixnum (type of numbers) inheritance chain. Provided you have not done something strange to that chain, we get a call to method_missing on the object 4 with these arguments: [:to_dragon, { magic: 4, height: 700 }]. Basically, that's the name appended to the front of the arguments, and a block should one be given.

Using this technique, you can override method_missing to get this code as a solution:

class String
  def method_to_class
    split('_').map(&:capitalize).join
  end
end

class Array
  def method_missing(method_name, *arguments, &block)
    find do |element|
      element.class.name == method_name.to_s.method_to_class
    end || super
  end
end

You add a method to String to convert a method name to a class name. Then, you redefine method_missing on Array to check each element to see if the class name matches the given class name. If one is found, then that is returned. Otherwise (and we do this using Ruby's fancy || operator), the value returned from that function is nil and the second operand to || is returned. This happens to be the default implementation for method_missing (which we get by the super keyword) and returns the error the call deserves.

The only potential issue with that is, if you have elements that have class names identical to method names that are already defined on arrays, then those will be called instead rather than this special technique. For example, calling an_array.hash will give you the hash code of the array rather than the first instance of a hash.

A safer technique in this respect is more similar to what I think you were trying to do. It actually uses class objects, and you can use it to override other methods:

class Array
  def add(class_object)
    class << self
      define_method class_object.name do
        find do |element|
          element.is_a? class_object
        end
      end
    end
  end
end

This defines new methods directly on an instance of an array. For example:

an_array = [Array, Hash, Dragon].map &:new
an_array.add Hash
an_array.hash    #=> {}

If this answer does not include a solution, it should at least guide you closer!

the name of method is the name of the class. example I save a pack and a product in a array so I use array.pack or array.product I could ask if parameter object is_a?(Class) but I want to make a generic method which accept anything. If my comments is confuse answer me, please.
There's an interesting way to do this with metaprogramming, which I will now add.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

meta/dynamic/generic programming in ruby

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

2 Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related