7

https://dotnetfiddle.net/446j0U link to reproduce (failed on .net 4.7.2 not on .net core)


public class TEST { 

   static public void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var test = new { Text = "test", Slab = "slab"};
        Console.WriteLine(test.Text); //outputs test
        Console.WriteLine(TEST.TestMethod(test));  //outputs slab
    }

    static public string TestMethod(dynamic obj)
    {
        return obj.Slab;
    }
} 

access to anonymous object in the same function is working OK but when I try to pass it in the function I'm getting exception

Run-time exception (line 14): Attempt by method 'DynamicClass.CallSite.Target(System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Closure, System.Runtime.CompilerServices.CallSite, System.Object)' to access type '<>f__AnonymousType0`2' failed.

Stack Trace:

[System.TypeAccessException: Attempt by method 'DynamicClass.CallSite.Target(System.Runtime.CompilerServices.Closure, System.Runtime.CompilerServices.CallSite, System.Object)' to access type '<>f__AnonymousType0`2' failed.] at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , Object ) at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecute1[T0,TRet](CallSite site, T0 arg0) at TEST.TestMethod(Object obj) :line 14 at TEST.Main(String[] args) :line 9


Edit by @RandRandom:

Since the bounty period is almost over, I decided to edit this question.

The given answers so far all fail to actually answer the problem at hand and only give ways to avoid the error.

OP clearly stated (in comments) that he is aware of workarounds and is currently using a workaround.

Those questions still remain

  1. WHY is the mentioned error occuring on OPs setup and on dotnetfiddle.net?
  2. If the error got fixed with an update what would OP need to update?
  3. Got the problem fixed in a new compiler / .Net Version / Visual Studio version?

To recap here are OP's Information so far:

  • VS 2017
  • .Net Framework 4.8
19
  • 3
    Doing this is likely a very bad idea. That said, your code is working fine in both LinqPad 5 and 6, so I am unable to replicate. Anything special with your project setup? Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 15:42
  • 3
    Can't reproduce the error. Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 15:42
  • 3
    Rand is rigth, no repro dotnetfiddle.net/usRSXU in .net core 3 but repro in 4.7.2 dotnetfiddle.net/PwtQxy . @RandRandom What framework did you try it on ? Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 15:45
  • 2
    Just as a curious note, If you add newtonsoft to the nuget packages, but without altering the code, it works. dotnetfiddle.net/2Mm9Ln I think this problem is related to dotnetfiddle. Commented Nov 19, 2019 at 16:34
  • 2
    It works for me even in VS2017 + 4.6.1. If it ever was a bug, it's fixed now, so why the bounty? Commented Nov 23, 2019 at 10:03

5 Answers 5

7

As C# documentation says:

Anonymous types provide a convenient way to encapsulate a set of read-only properties into a single object without having to explicitly define a type first. The type name is generated by the compiler and is not available at the source code level. The type of each property is inferred by the compiler.

There are two obvious ways:

1) Replace anonymous type with pre-defined:

    public class Container {
        public string Test { get; set; }
        public string Slab { get; set; }
    }

    public static void Main(string[] args) {
        var test = new Container { Text = "test", Slab = "slab"};
        Console.WriteLine(test.Text); //outputs test
        Console.WriteLine(TestMethod(test));  //outputs slab
    }

    public static string TestMethod(dynamic obj) {
        return obj.Slab;
    }

This way restricts you not to use an anonymous type. But it will work fine.

2) or if you like anonymous types, use casting with ExpandoObject.

Documentation: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.dynamic.expandoobject?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.8

Sample: https://sebnilsson.com/blog/convert-c-anonymous-or-any-types-into-dynamic-expandoobject/

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

1 Comment

Thank you Egor. I can't mark it as answer because it should work the way I'm using it (at least I need clear explanation from MS why it works in .net core). But it's the workaround I'm using.
2
+25

This should work,

static public string TestMethod(dynamic obj) {
     return obj.GetType().GetProperty("Slab").GetValue(obj).ToString();
}

Comments

0

You can use ExpandoObject for dynamic type of variables or dynamic parameters. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/api/system.dynamic.expandoobject?redirectedfrom=MSDN&view=netframework-4.8

public class TEST { 

   static public void Main(string[] args)
    {
        dynamic test = new ExpandoObject();
        test.Text = "test";
        test.Slab = "slab";
        Console.WriteLine(test.Text);
        Console.WriteLine(TEST.TestMethod(test));
    }

    static public string TestMethod(dynamic obj)
    {
        return obj.Slab;
    }
} 

Comments

0

This is a problem with .NET Fiddle. The code is working perfectly fine with the latest Visual Studio 2017 update (15.9.17) and .NET 4.7.2.

Comments

-1

This is an issue with .Net framework. You have to use Datatype which already exist and use var. Alternate way to code this is to use dictionary.

demo

using System; 
using System.Collections.Generic;

public class TEST 
{ 
   static public void Main(string[] args)
    {
        var test =  new Dictionary<int, string>();
        test.Add(1,"One");
        Console.WriteLine(test); //outputs test
        Console.WriteLine(TEST.TestMethod(test));  //outputs slab
    }

    static public string TestMethod(dynamic obj)
    {
        foreach (KeyValuePair<int, string> item in obj)
        {
            Console.WriteLine("Key: {0}, Value: {1}", item.Key, item.Value);
            return item.Value;
        }
        return "";   
    }
} 

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.