Rails 3.1 Rspec Creating test case validate field for Model

Question

I'm trying to create a test case for User model. Basically, it will validate first_name and last_name to be present.

What I am trying to do is to check whether the error on a specific field is empty or not and it should be empty. However it always fails.

What is the correct way to do this?

Here is my code

On my user_spec.rb

require 'spec_helper'

describe User do

  before do
    @user = User.new
  end

  it "must have a first name" do
    @user.errors[:first_name].should_not be_empty
  end

  it "must have a last name" do
    @user.errors[:last_name].should_not be_empty
  end
end

On my user.rb file

class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  validates :first_name, :presence => true
  validates :last_name, :presence => true
end

jake · Accepted Answer · 2014-08-01 11:42:30Z

18

You can test by simply doing this as well:

describe 'validations' do
  it { should validate_presence_of :firstname }
  it { should validate_presence_of :lastname  }
end

Take a look at the shoulda matchers for all such standard Rails Validation. This way is not just more concise but also takes care of the positive case. Meaning you then dont need to test the scenario mentioned below:

it "passed validations when first_name is set"
  user = User.create(:firstname => 'f', :lastname => 'l')
  user.errors[:first_name].should be_empty
  user.errors[:last_name].should be_empty
end

edited Aug 1, 2014 at 11:42

answered Jan 6, 2012 at 20:30

jake

2,4191 gold badge21 silver badges31 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

3 Comments

MikeH Over a year ago

Upvoted for future viewers. The shoulda matchers are more elegant for testing validations.

morgents Over a year ago

instead of using describing with it "should ..." do it's better to use it { should validate_presence_of :firstname }

jake Over a year ago

I have updated the answer based on the new and better syntax proposed by @moregeek

Phil Misiowiec · Accepted Answer · 2011-08-05 22:23:20Z

RSpec supports the notion of an "implicit" subject. If your first argument to the "describe" block is a class, RSpec automatically makes an instance of that class available to your specs. See http://relishapp.com/rspec/rspec-core/v/2-6/dir/subject/implicit-subject.

require 'spec_helper'

describe User do

  it "must have a first name" do    
    subject.should have(1).error_on(:first_name)
  end

  it "must have a last name" do
    subject.should have(1).error_on(:last_name)
  end
end

which results in RSpec output (if using --format documentation) of:

User
  must have a first name
  must have a last name

You can abbreviate it even further if you are content with the RSpec output defaults:

require 'spec_helper'

describe User do
  it { should have(1).error_on(:first_name) }
  it { should have(1).error_on(:last_name) }
end

which results in:

User
  should have 1 error on :first_name
  should have 1 error on :last_name

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Rails 3.1 Rspec Creating test case validate field for Model

2 Answers 2

3 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

3 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related