1
const users = 
[
  {
    _id: "5fbfa729fc46a415ce5503a6",
    first_name: 'Allen',
    last_name: 'Border',
    timestamp: 1606395689121,
    key: [ "5fbf6f91aff7f3320a906547", "5fbfa748fc46a415ce5503a8" ]
  },
  {
    _id: "5fbfa6fbfc46a415ce5503a4",
    first_name: 'james',
    last_name: 'roger',
    timestamp: 1606395689125
  },
  {
    _id: "5fbf6f91aff7f3320a906547",
    first_name: 'david',
    last_name: 'gosh',
    timestamp: 1606395689130,
    key: [ "5fbfa729fc46a415ce5503a6" ]
  },
  {
    _id: "5e4e74eb380054797d9db623",
    first_name: 'Ricky',
    last_name: 'bichel',
    timestamp: 1606395689131
  }
]

const user_id = "5fbfa748fc46a415ce5503a8";

how to seperate match not match data if user_id matched with users.key it should have matched data that does not match should have notMatch data. can we separate two results match and not match records ?

Does not work

const result = users.key.indexOf(user_id);

console.log(users.storyMute)

1 Answer 1

3

You may use Array.prototype.reduce() the following way:

const users=[{_id:"5fbfa729fc46a415ce5503a6",first_name:"Allen",last_name:"Border",timestamp:1606395689121,key:["5fbf6f91aff7f3320a906547","5fbfa748fc46a415ce5503a8"]},{_id:"5fbfa6fbfc46a415ce5503a4",first_name:"james",last_name:"roger",timestamp:1606395689125},{_id:"5fbf6f91aff7f3320a906547",first_name:"david",last_name:"gosh",timestamp:1606395689130,key:["5fbfa729fc46a415ce5503a6"]},{_id:"5e4e74eb380054797d9db623",first_name:"Ricky",last_name:"bichel",timestamp:1606395689131}]
const user_id="5fbfa748fc46a415ce5503a8"

const {matching, nonMatching} = users.reduce((acc, userRecord) => {
  userRecord?.key?.includes(user_id)
  // or, if you need to compare by _id
  // userRecord._id === user_id
    ? acc.matching.push(userRecord)
    : acc.nonMatching.push(userRecord)
  return acc
}, {matching: [], nonMatching: []})

console.log(matching)

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

6 Comments

Support for the experimental syntax 'optionalChaining' isn't currently enabled what is that mean ?
can we rewrite this condition userRecord?.key?.includes(user_id)
@simon : You can do userRecord.key && userRecord.key.includes(..
@simon : someone was faster to respond that :)
|

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.