How to design Selenium 2 tests with the Page Object pattern using inheritance

Question

We are now writing a new test suite using Selenium 2 (Webdriver) and TestNG. Our tests use the Page Object pattern and we are very happy with the the way things are looking so far. However, we ran into a design issue with our tests and we don't seem to be able to find a good solution for it. Let me give you an example. Here is our LoginTestCase:

public class LoginTestCase extends MyTestCase {
    @BeforeTest
    public void login() {
        HomePage homepage = PageFactory.initElements(getDriver(), HomePage.class);
        LoginPage loginPage = homepage.login();
        DashboardPage dashboardPage = loginPage.loginUser("username", "password");
    }   
}

We would like to extend our tests that require a user to be logged in from this test. Ideally we would be able to write something like this:

public class DashboardTestCase extends LoginTestCase {
    @Test
    public void testDashboard(DashboardPage dashboardPage) { 
        ...
    }
}

At this point the user is at the DashboardPage and the only thing needed is the object of that page which was created in the LoginTestCase.

I know the obvious solution is to store that object in a variable (in the LoginTestCase) that will then be access by the child test cases. However this looks very ugly and can lead to a misuse of that variable.

Is there a better solution for this or some pattern that addresses this design issue?

Mairbek Khadikov · Accepted Answer · 2011-12-22 22:09:55Z

3

We used dependency injection and Guice with Guice-berry to solve this problem. The page objects were injected to the test methods and WebDriver was injected to the page objects.

As a tradeoff we had not used all this nice little chaining between page objects.

But static state and singletons are pain in the ass when it comes to parallel test execution so they should be avoided.

answered Dec 22, 2011 at 22:09

Mairbek Khadikov

8,1073 gold badges39 silver badges52 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Comments

Tarken · Accepted Answer · 2011-12-05 10:25:02Z

1

I haven't found a better solution yet. I have a singelton WebDriver in a static class from where all my testcases can access the WebDriver. My testclasses all need to be run on the same WebDriver due to Login/Session.

answered Dec 5, 2011 at 10:25

Tarken

2,2022 gold badges25 silver badges42 bronze badges

Comments

user2236511 · Accepted Answer · 2013-04-02 14:42:13Z

I think you should store a reference to the page object in a private variable in LoginTestCase class and provide a protected getter so that the child tests can access the pageobject. This helps achieve two things

Encapsulate the variable with in your LoginTestCase so that no one can mess it up with that..
Providing a protected getter make sure only the child test cases get access to it and that's what you wanted after all. so that should not a problem.

This is how your code will look like after the changes. Hope that makes sense:

public class LoginTestCase extends MyTestCase {

    private dashboardPage;

    @BeforeTest
    public void login() {
        HomePage homepage = PageFactory.initElements(getDriver(), HomePage.class);
        LoginPage loginPage = homepage.login();
        dashboardPage = loginPage.loginUser("username", "password");
    }

    protected void getDashBoardPage() {
        return dashboardPage;  
    }

}

public class DashboardTestCase extends LoginTestCase {
    @Test
    public void testDashboard() { 
            DashboardPage dashboardPage = getDashBoardPage();
        ...
    }
}

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

How to design Selenium 2 tests with the Page Object pattern using inheritance

3 Answers 3

Comments

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

3 Answers 3

Comments

Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related