0
$\begingroup$

I've had a look on the problem of a ball on a rotating circular track where the ball reaches a stable position at a fixed height that depends on the angular velocity and radius of the track only. For images and a video see https://www.leifiphysik.de/mechanik/kreisbewegung/versuche/kugel-rotierender-rinne (German language)

I do understand the derivation for the height $h=R-\frac{g}{\omega^2}$ and also understand that the derivation implicitly assumes $0\leq h\leq R$.

Taken together this suggests a lower bound for the angular velocity $\omega_\mathrm{min}=\sqrt{\frac{g}{R}}$ below which there is no stable motion. This value seems to correspond to the case where the gravitation force equals the centrifugal force at Radius $R$.

What I don't understand is the physical reason for such minimal angular speed and what it would have to do with rotation at radius $R$ (since in this case the radius of rotation would be closer to 0 than $R$). I imagine it has to do something with the forces, but don't really see how a minimum comes about.


One idea I had is that the shape of the track plays a role. Since it is rather flat in the center I would expect the normal force to be almost the same as the ball moves away from the center position, while the centrifugal force grows with $r^2$. However this is contrary to experiment, where the ball only starts to rise if the speed is sufficiently big.

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

A stable equilibrium exists for all angular velocities. It is located at $r=0$ if $\omega^2 < g/R$, and at a finite $r$ if $\omega^2 > g/R$.

The motion of the ball in the rotating (non-inertial) frame can be described as motion in the potential field $$ U(r) = mg\,h(r) - \frac{1}{2} m \omega^2 r^2, $$ where $h(r) = R - \sqrt{R^2 - r^2}$. For $\omega = 0$, the potential profile is convex, so the equilibrium at $r=0$ is stable. The derivatives of $U(r)$ are $$ \frac{dU}{dr} = m g r \left( \frac{1}{R - h} - \frac{\omega^2}{g} \right), $$ $$ \frac{d^2U}{dr^2} = m g \left( \frac{R^2}{(R - h)^3} - \frac{\omega^2}{g} \right). $$ All equilibrium positions and their stability follow from these expressions. For $\omega^2 < g/R$, the minimum of $U(r)$ is at $r=0$ and stable. When $\omega^2 = g/R$, the curvature at $r=0$ vanishes, giving neutral stability. For $\omega^2 > g/R$, the point $r=0$ becomes unstable, and a new stable equilibrium appears at finite $r$, where $h = R - {g}/{\omega^2}$. The figure below illustrates the behaviour of $U(r)$.

enter image description here

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that makes sense. Is there a way to understand why this happens, when $m\cdot \omega^2\cdot R = m\cdot g$ ? $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 5 at 14:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @user1583209 Yes. Near the bottom, where $r \ll R$, the reaction force $\vec{F}_N$ is nearly vertical, so $F_N \simeq mg$. Its horizontal component is $F_{ZP} \simeq (r/R) F_N$. The equilibrium at $r=0$ becomes neutral when $F_{ZP} = m \omega^2 r$ for $r \to 0$, which gives $\omega^2 = g/R$. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 5 at 15:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.