Skip to content

[CI][UR] Bump DPC++ version used in UR workflow #20781

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: sycl
Choose a base branch
from
Open

[CI][UR] Bump DPC++ version used in UR workflow #20781

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion .github/workflows/ur-build-hw.yml
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ jobs:

- name: Download DPC++
Copy link
Contributor Author

@lukaszstolarczuk lukaszstolarczuk Nov 28, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

my thought here is - when we first introduced this workflow it was the easiest way of using dpc++ in UR workflow. We didn't want to introduce too much changes in CI... but now, almost one year later we're still using this approach. It doesn't look too good, am I wrong?

Perhaps, we should use nightly docker images or integrate this workflow into sycl-linux-precommit and make use of toolchain_artifact...?

run: |
wget -O dpcpp_compiler.tar.gz https://github.com/intel/llvm/releases/download/nightly-2024-12-12/sycl_linux.tar.gz
wget -O dpcpp_compiler.tar.gz https://github.com/intel/llvm/releases/download/nightly-2025-11-28/sycl_linux.tar.gz
mkdir -p dpcpp_compiler
tar -xvf dpcpp_compiler.tar.gz -C dpcpp_compiler

Expand Down
Loading