Hide some object fields before outputing?

Question

Is it possible to hide certain fields before outputting it?

For the sake of simplicity let's say I have User and Image one user can have multiple images.

User

public class User
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public IEnumerable<Image> Images { get; set; }
}

Output

{
    Id: "1",
    Name: "Steve"
}

Now I want to output User with images and without. Is it possible to do something like this?
_db.Users.SingleOrDefault(x => x.Id == id).Except(x => x.Images);

This would be possible by adding [JsonIgnore] but it's not an option since I will want to output Images in some different request.
This would be possible by outputting anonymous objects but it's not an option.
This would be possible by creating DTO, but even so, how can I assign properties automatically from model to dto? Imagine that I have 30 fields, I don't want to assign them manually.

@Romoku from a glance looks like this is what I need. Thanks a lot, I will investigate further. — Stan
– Stan, Commented Aug 8, 2013 at 17:27

Dustin Kingen · Accepted Answer · 2013-08-08 17:33:43Z

0

Imagine that I have 30 fields, I don't want to assign them manually.

Automapper to the rescue!

PM> Install-Package AutoMapper

DTO:

public class User
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public IEnumerable<Image> Images { get; set; }
}

public class UserInfo
{
    public int Id { get; set; }
    public string Name { get; set; }
}

Code:

Mapper.CreateMap<User, UserInfo>();

var user = new User { Id = 1, Name = "Bob" };

var userInfo = Mapper.Map<User, UserInfo>(user);

return Json(new { userInfo });

answered Aug 8, 2013 at 17:33

Dustin Kingen

21.4k7 gold badges55 silver badges94 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

skmasq Over a year ago

This isn't dynamic enough, image more complex system with 8 variables that may or may not be shown in result.

Dustin Kingen Over a year ago

This is only an example. Automapper has a ton of features.

King King · Accepted Answer · 2013-08-08 18:15:46Z

0

I think this is also a solution which is worth your attention: You can define some base class or interface which contains elements you want, something like this:

public class UserBase {
  public int Id {get;set}
  public string Name {get;set;}
}
public class User : UserBase {
  public IEnumerable<Image> Images { get; set; }
}

//or using interface, I think this is better
public class IUserBase {
  int Id {get;set}
  string Name {get;set;}
}
public class User : IUserBase {
  public int Id { get; set; }
  public string Name { get; set; }
  public IEnumerable<Image> Images { get; set; }
}

Then in your LINQ query, you can do something like this:

var result = users.Select(x=>(IUserBase)x);
foreach(var user in result)
   System.Diagnostics.Debug.Print(user.Id + " : " + user.Name);//There is no `Images` element here except using explicitly cast to User type.

answered Aug 8, 2013 at 18:15

King King

63.5k16 gold badges118 silver badges140 bronze badges

1 Comment

skmasq Over a year ago

I think what he want is, depending on database settings choose which properties to show.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Hide some object fields before outputing?

User

Output

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

User

Output

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

1 Comment

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related