Function returns null pointer instead of address

Question

I'm playing around with pointers to understand this concept better and wanted to ask

Why do i get null pointer as return for the second function?

and why it isn't possible to get the address 0x7fff15504044. What is happening and where inside memory is the integer 5 stored, when im working with it inside the function?.

#include <iostream>
using namespace std;

int* return_adress(int* input){ return input; }

int* return_adress_from_input(int input){ return &input; }

int main(){
    int k = 3; 
    cout << return_adress(&k) << endl;
    cout << return_adress_from_input(k) << endl;
}

Output:

0x7fff15504044

0

Because it's undefined behavior. Also open your C++ book to the chapter that explains how parameters are passed by value. — Sam Varshavchik
– Sam Varshavchik, Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:34
related: stackoverflow.com/questions/6441218/… and stackoverflow.com/questions/373419/… — NathanOliver
– NathanOliver, Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:34
You probably want to take input by reference and not by value: int input =>int& input — AMA
– AMA, Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:36
@AMA: Then the OP would be advised to change the return type to const int*. — Bathsheba
– Bathsheba, Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:40
@AMA: If I continue to type, will you fix the bugs in my code too ;-) ? — Bathsheba
– Bathsheba, Commented Dec 13, 2018 at 13:41

Bathsheba · Accepted Answer · 2018-12-13 14:17:54Z

7

With int* return_adress_from_input(int input), input is a value copy of k in the caller. They are two different variables therefore with different addresses.

input goes out of scope conceptually once the closing brace of the function is reached.

The pointer &input then points to memory that you no longer own, and the behaviour of reading that pointer value (let alone dereferencing it) is undefined prior to C++14, and implementation defined from and including C++14.

edited Dec 13, 2018 at 14:17

answered Dec 13, 2018 at 13:36

Bathsheba

235k35 gold badges376 silver badges504 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

2 Comments

Passer By Over a year ago

It's implementation defined since C++14

Bathsheba Over a year ago

@PasserBy: So it is: which accounts for the nullptr value.

Dmytro Dadyka · Accepted Answer · 2018-12-13 14:56:54Z

1

Because you pass input by value, not by reference. Compiller first creates a local copy of input and then returns address of this local copy. To get the variable address use

int* return_adress_from_input(int& input){ return &input; }

In general, you get undefined behavior which can lead to returning nullptr in the particular case

On my PC i get

00AFFC80
00AFFBA8

so you are just lucky with zero return

edited Dec 13, 2018 at 14:56

answered Dec 13, 2018 at 14:50

Dmytro Dadyka

2,2685 gold badges22 silver badges38 bronze badges

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Function returns null pointer instead of address

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

2 Answers 2

2 Comments

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related