457

I'm probably answering my own question, but I'm extremely curious.

I know that CSS can select individual children of a parent, but is there support to style the children of a container, if its parent has a certain amount of children.

for example

container:children(8) .child {
  //style the children this way if there are 8 children
}

I know it sounds weird, but my manager asked me to check it out, haven't found anything on my own so I decided to turn to SO before ending the search.

2
  • 4
    Quantity Query SCSS Mixin: codepen.io/jakob-e/pen/wgGpeP Commented Apr 13, 2017 at 12:11
  • Jun 3 '20 edit by @vsync should be reverted, as it changes the code sample in a way that does not agree in any way with the question itself or its answers. Commented Jan 13, 2021 at 23:53

13 Answers 13

912

Clarification:

Because of a previous phrasing in the original question, a few SO citizens have raised concerns that this answer could be misleading. Note that, in CSS3, styles cannot be applied to a parent node based on the number of children it has. However, styles can be applied to the children nodes based on the number of siblings they have.


Original answer:

Incredibly, this is now possible purely in CSS3.

/* one item */
li:first-child:nth-last-child(1) {
/* -or- li:only-child { */
    width: 100%;
}

/* two items */
li:first-child:nth-last-child(2),
li:first-child:nth-last-child(2) ~ li {
    width: 50%;
}

/* three items */
li:first-child:nth-last-child(3),
li:first-child:nth-last-child(3) ~ li {
    width: 33.3333%;
}

/* four items */
li:first-child:nth-last-child(4),
li:first-child:nth-last-child(4) ~ li {
    width: 25%;
}

The trick is to select the first child when it's also the nth-from-the-last child. This effectively selects based on the number of siblings.

Credit for this technique goes to André Luís (discovered) & Lea Verou (refined).

Don't you just love CSS3? 😄

CodePen Example:

Sources:

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

19 Comments

Very handy. I wrote a SASS mixin that makes use of this technique: codepen.io/anon/pen/pJeLdE?editors=110
If it works in codepen but not with my project then it is most definitely my fault. My bad. This answer is correct! Correct, I say!
Might be nice to add why this works, for people not used to multiple pseudo selectors (like I was until now ;). What is happening here is that this selects the child that is at the same time child x from the start/top and child y from the end. And so this only selects something if there are exactly x+y children.
Note that instead of :first-child:nth-last-child(1) you can also use :only-child.
Just to point out that with the new :has() selector being implanted in many browsers, CSS can now select parent.
|
98

Now we can use the :has() selector to identify the number of items and apply style to the container as well as the child items

Code taken from my blog: css-tip.com/number-elements-has-selector (I also made a quantity query generator to easily generate the code)

The below will give you an exact counting:

.container {
  height: 50px;
  margin: 10px;
}

.container:not(:has(*)) { /* 0 elements */
  background: yellow;
}
.container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(1)) { /* 1 element */
  background: red;
}
.container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(2)) { /* 2 elements */
  background: blue;
}
.container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(3)) { /* 3 elements */
  background: green;
}
/* For N elements 
.container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(N)) {
  background: red;
}
*/
<div class="container">

</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>

But you can also have a range selection:

.container {
  height: 50px;
  margin: 10px;
}

.container:has(> :nth-child(3)) { /* 3 elements or more */
  background: blue;
}
/* .container:has(> :nth-child(X)) : X elements or more */

.container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(-n + 3)) { /* between 1 and 3 elements */
  border: 5px solid red;
}
/* .container:has(> :last-child:nth-child(-n + X)): between 1 and X elements */

.container:has(> :nth-last-child(3):nth-child(-n + 3)) { /* between 3 and 5 elements */
  width: 80%;
}
/* .container:has(> :nth-last-child(X):nth-child(-n + (Y - X + 1))): between X and Y elements */
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>
<div class="container">
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
  <div></div>
</div>

5 Comments

It's still in very early stage. It should not be used on Production Level caniuse.com/css-has
I'd like to add to this that you can use :has(> :nth-child(n+3)) if you want to have the properties applied if there are a minimum number of items too.
@Bernesto Isn't it just :has(> :nth-child(3))? Why add the n+ part?
Just like to point out that :has is now supported in Firefox so this is now perfectly fine for production unless you're supporting some very old browsers.
This also works for nth-of-type()
67

No. Well, not really. There are a couple of selectors that can get you somewhat close, but probably won't work in your example and don't have the best browser compatibility.

:only-child

The :only-child is one of the few true counting selectors in the sense that it's only applied when there is one child of the element's parent. Using your idealized example, it acts like children(1) probably would.

:nth-child

The :nth-child selector might actually get you where you want to go depending on what you're really looking to do. If you want to style all elements if there are 8 children, you're out of luck. If, however, you want to apply styles to the 8th and later elements, try this:

p:nth-child( n + 8 ){
    /* add styles to make it pretty */
}

Unfortunately, these probably aren't the solutions you're looking for. In the end, you'll probably need to use some Javascript wizardry to apply the styles based on the count - even if you were to use one of these, you'd need to have a hard look at browser compatibility before going with a pure CSS solution.

W3 CSS3 Spec on pseudo-classes

EDIT I read your question a little differently - there are a couple other ways to style the parent, not the children. Let me throw a few other selectors your way:

:empty and :not

This styles elements that have no children. Not that useful on its own, but when paired with the :not selector, you can style only the elements that have children:

div:not(:empty) {
    /* We know it has stuff in it! */
}

You can't count how many children are available with pure CSS here, but it is another interesting selector that lets you do cool things.

2 Comments

It's worth noting the original question was edited, rendering the initial "No" a bit misleading (just fyi 😛)
Beware! The last solution (with :not(:empty)) will not work if one would like to style only elements with "real" content (concrete elements for example) - as it will style also divs with only whitespaces or newline characters for example: jsfiddle.net/c69kbuxm . Considering that the statement "This styles elements that have no children." may be misleading I believe. Thank You for the answer anyway.
28

NOTE: This solution will return the children of sets of certain lengths, not the parent element as you have asked. Hopefully, it's still useful.

Andre Luis came up with a method: http://lea.verou.me/2011/01/styling-children-based-on-their-number-with-css3/ Unfortunately, it only works in IE9 and above.

Essentially, you combine :nth-child() with other pseudo classes that deal with the position of an element. This approach allows you to specify elements from sets of elements with specific lengths.

For instance :nth-child(1):nth-last-child(3) matches the first element in a set while also being the 3rd element from the end of the set. This does two things: guarantees that the set only has three elements and that we have the first of the three. To specify the second element of the three element set, we'd use :nth-child(2):nth-last-child(2).


Example 1 - Select all list elements if set has three elements:

li:nth-child(1):nth-last-child(3),
li:nth-child(2):nth-last-child(2),
li:nth-child(3):nth-last-child(1) {
    width: 33.3333%;
}

Example 1 alternative from Lea Verou:

li:first-child:nth-last-child(3),
li:first-child:nth-last-child(3) ~ li {
    width: 33.3333%;
}


Example 2 - target last element of set with three list elements:

li:nth-child(3):last-child {
    /* I'm the last of three */
}

Example 2 alternative:

li:nth-child(3):nth-last-child(1) {
    /* I'm the last of three */
}


Example 3 - target second element of set with four list elements:

li:nth-child(2):nth-last-child(3) {
    /* I'm the second of four */
}

3 Comments

again, this is number of siblings, not children
@TMS see accepted answer's edit - the OP's question was awkwardly phrased
This approach is perfect for when each element needs to be styled differently based on its position in the list, e.g. to get even circular transforms: li:nth-child(3):nth-last-child(1) { transform: rotate(120deg); } li:nth-child(2):nth-last-child(2) { transform: rotate(240deg); } and so on...
13

Working off of Matt's solution, I used the following Compass/SCSS implementation.

@for $i from 1 through 20 {
    li:first-child:nth-last-child( #{$i} ),
    li:first-child:nth-last-child( #{$i} ) ~ li {
      width: calc(100% / #{$i} - 10px);
    }
  }

This allows you to quickly expand the number of items.

1 Comment

Instead of this you could easily use Flexbox…
5

If you are going to do it in pure CSS (using scss) but you have different elements/classes inside the same parent class you can use this version!!

  &:first-of-type:nth-last-of-type(1) {
    max-width: 100%;
  }

  @for $i from 2 through 10 {
    &:first-of-type:nth-last-of-type(#{$i}),
    &:first-of-type:nth-last-of-type(#{$i}) ~ & {
      max-width: (100% / #{$i});
    }
  }

Comments

5

Yes we can do this using nth-child like this:

div:nth-child(n + 8) {
    background: red;
} 

This will make the 8th div child onwards become red. Hope this helps...

Also, if someone ever says "hey, they can't be done with styled using css, use JS!" doubt them immediately. CSS is extremely flexible nowadays

.container div {
  background: blue;
}

.container div:nth-child(n + 8) {
  background: red;
}
<div class="container">
  <div>div 1</div>
  <div>div 2</div>
  <div>div 3</div>
  <div>div 4</div>
  <div>div 5</div>
  <div>div 6</div>
  <div>div 7</div>
  <div>div 8</div>
  <div>div 9</div>
  <div>div 10</div>
  <div>div 11</div>
  <div>div 12</div>
</div>

In the example the first 7 children are blue, then 8 onwards are red...

[External example]

5 Comments

Perhaps add a note about the unfortunate lack of support?
I don't think this is exactly what Brodie is asking - this will style the children after a given amount, but can't select the ancestor/containing element based on the number of its children.
This is actually some pretty good information though, thanks alan but bee is right, I was trying to say "if an element has this many children us this style" If I'm not mistaken your method would style the 8th child on, but the first 7 would be lonely and naked.
@primatology - The only browser that doesn't support nth-child is IE<9. All others have been supporting it two versions back or more.
-1 This will not make div child red, this will make the div red based on its number within its siblings! Is not related to div's child in any way!
4

If you're looking for a way to style all elements if more than N exist (e.g. 2 or more):

li:first-child:nth-last-child(n+2),
li:first-child:nth-last-child(n+2) ~ li {
  background-color: red;
}
<ul>
  <li>first</li>
</ul>

<ul>
  <li>first</li>
  <li>second</li>
</ul>

<ul>
  <li>first</li>
  <li>second</li>
  <li>third</li>
</ul>

4 Comments

Can this be used to select and style only the 6th element, if it is also the 5th from the last? If so, then, for example, when you had pagination on mobile that showed too many pages, you could set some of the center ones to display:none.
@F.Certainly. that's quite a different requirement, but is possible with li:nth-child(6):nth-last-child(5) { background-color: red } jsfiddle.net/0eahnrfd
For some reason that wouldn't set the display property to none, but the original solution turned out for the better
The some reason probably would be specificity issues, with another set of rules overriding it if background-color: red or similar worked.
2

Since this question is about styling the children themselves, rather than their parent (or any ancestor), it is now possible using the CSS sibling-count function:

@property --siblings {
  syntax: "<integer>";
  inherits: false;
  initial-value: 0;
}

@property --more-than-n-children {
  syntax: "<integer>";
  inherits: false;
  initial-value: 0;
}

body{ font:32px arial; }

section b {
  --siblings: sibling-count();
  --n: 2;
  --more-than-n-children: clamp(0, var(--siblings) - var(--n), 1);

  color: if(
   style(--siblings: 2): red; 
   style(--siblings: 3): green; 
   else: blue
  );

  text-decoration: if(
   style(--more-than-n-children: 1): underline
  );
}
<section>
  <b>1</b>
</section>

<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
</section>

<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
  <b>3</b>
</section>

<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
  <b>3</b>
  <b>4</b>
</section>

The above should render as so:

enter image description here

enter image description here It is a valid solution for some situations and for others it's simpler to do:

section:has(> :last-child:nth-child(3)) {
  color: green;
}
<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
</section>

<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
  <b>3</b>
</section>

<section>
  <b>1</b>
  <b>2</b>
  <b>3</b>
  <b>4</b>
</section>

Comments

1

You can use :has selector like this:

.parent-element:has(:nth-child(8))

It selects element with .parent-element class that has child number 8. If child number 8 does not exist, rule will not be applied.

Unfortunately :has is not supported in firefox by default. You can still use it and add extra tricky rule for firefox support.

1 Comment

That;s a great solution. :has() CSS pseudo class can be enabled on Firefox by navigating to about:config in a new window and toggling the ``layout.css.has-selector` attribute to true.
0

No, there is nothing like this in CSS. You can, however, use JavaScript to calculate the number of children and apply styles.

2 Comments

@Lübnah Can you explain why it is not true?
This statement is not true nowaydays as we see working solutions within the up-voted answers and also with the introduction of the :has pseudo-class
-1

If You want to stylize differently based on child count in specific range,
You can use
(this example counts just span childs not having "hidden" class
if You want less specific selector omit the part after nth-child index)

.selector {
    /* default style for 0 - 9 childs */
}

.selector:has(:nth-child(10 of span:not(.hidden))) {
    /* style for 10 - 19 childs (10th child exists) */
}

.selector:has(:nth-child(20 of span:not(.hidden))) {
    /* style for 20 - 29 childs (20th child exists) */
}

.selector:has(:nth-child(30 of span:not(.hidden))) {
    /* style for 30 and more childs (30th child exists) */
}

Comments

-2

If you are using something like reactJS, you can simply add a class and then style it.

e.g. suppose you are displaying items from an array.

app.jsx

<div className={`items-count-is-${items.length}`}>
    {items.map(item => {
       return <li>...</li>;
    })}
</div>

e.g. CSS: items-count-is-5 {...}

1 Comment

You do not want to hard code endless CSS rules to simply accommodate numbers. This solution would be better if you included rules with variable numbers, which are entirely possible using SCSS or the like.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.