I have a basic understanding of XML. My question is why is it necessary to mention the encoding used at the beginning of a XML document and why encoding is required ?
1
-
related question: stackoverflow.com/q/5165347/1698732Akram Berkawy– Akram Berkawy2013-03-12 17:28:49 +00:00Commented Mar 12, 2013 at 17:28
Add a comment
|
2 Answers
It is not required, although usually you may want to include it:
In the absence of external character encoding information (such as MIME headers), parsed entities which are stored in an encoding other than UTF-8 or UTF-16 must begin with a text declaration (see 4.3.1 The Text Declaration) containing an encoding declaration.
So, for example, when transferring XML via HTTP, XML parser might use the value from Content-Type header like this:
Content-Type application/xml; charset=UTF-8
But once this document is stored locally, it would not contain this information - thus it seems like a good idea to include encoding into the declaration part of XML document.
1 Comment
K3---rnc
why is it necessary to mention the encoding used at the beginning of a XML document
It isn't. There are defaults. (UTF-8 and UTF-16, which can be reliably distinguished between programatically)
and why encoding is required
Computers only understand binary. Encoding is the process of representing letters, numbers, etc in binary so it can be processed by a computer. Different encodings store the characters in different ways.
10 Comments
AmritaS
This means I need not mention encoding in the <?xml tag ?
Quentin
So long as the encoding is UTF-8 or UTF-16.
kamituel
@Quentin, is that true? From the spec: `TextDecl ::= '<?xml' VersionInfo? EncodingDecl S? '?>' - I think EncodingDecl can me ommited only if the whole XML delcaration is being ommited.
kamituel
@AmritaS, <?xml is not a tag per se, it's an XML declaration.
AmritaS
@Quentin Even the version attribute can be omitted ?
|