14

I'm calling an async library method with .ConfigureAwait(false). But, I still end up with deadlock. (I'm using it in ASP.NET controller API) But, if I use the same method wrapped into Task.Run() it works fine.

My understanding is, if the libraries method is not using ConfigureAwait internally then adding ConfigureAwait won't solve the problem as in the library call it will result in deadlock (we block on it by using .Result). But, if that's the case why does it work in Task.Run() as it will fail to continue in same context/thread.

This article talks about it. Btw, I have read plenty of articles by Stephen Cleary. But, why Task.Run() works is a mystery.

Code snippet:

// This Create Method results in Deadlock
public async Task<string> Create(MyConfig config)
{
        Document doc = await Client.CreateDocumentAsync(CollectionUri, config).ConfigureAwait(false);
        return doc.Id;
}

// Uses Task.Run() which works properly, why??
public string Create(MyConfig config)
{
    Document doc = Task.Run(() => Client.CreateDocumentAsync(CollectionUri, config)).Result;
    return doc.Id;
}

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult CreateConfig(MyConfig config)
{
     string id = Create(config).Result;
     return Json(id);
}
0

3 Answers 3

16

I believe Lukazoid is correct. To put it another way...

// This Create Method results in Deadlock
public async Task<string> Create(MyConfig config)
{
  Document doc = await Client.CreateDocumentAsync(CollectionUri, config).ConfigureAwait(false);
  return doc.Id;
}

You can't just stick a ConfigureAwait(false) at one level and have it magically prevent deadlocks. ConfigureAwait(false) can only prevent deadlocks if it is used by every await in the transitive closure of that method and all methods it calls.

In other words, ConfigureAwait(false) needs to be used for every await in Create (which it is), and it also needs to be used for every await in CreateDocumentAsync (which we don't know), and it also needs to be used for every await in every method that CreateDocumentAsync calls, etc.

This is one reason why it is such a brittle "solution" to the deadlock problem.

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

4 Comments

Every async call should be adequately documented on that matter in order to take the right decision. Using await [async call].ConfigureAwait(false) or await Task.Run(async ()=> await [async call]).ConfigureAwait(false).
@ThanasisIoannidis: That would be great in theory, but in reality a missing ConfigureAwait(false) is usually a mistake. So the documentation would just be wrong.
can we say that "all the way configreawait(false)" like it is said "all the way await"?
@batmaci: Yes, in the sense that if you're going to use it, it's best to use it all the way.
11

In the first example, the implementation of Client.CreateDocumentAsync is deadlocking because it is trying to execute a continuation using the current SynchronizationContext.

When using Task.Run, the delegate will be invoked on a ThreadPool thread, this means there will be no current SynchronizationContext so all continuations will be resumed using a ThreadPool thread. This means it will not deadlock.

Out of interest, why is your CreateConfig method not async? Most recent versions of MVC and WebAPI support asynchronous methods, getting rid of the .Result would be the best solution.

3 Comments

Shouldn't use of ConfigureAwait(false) ensure continuation using ThreadPool? and yes, I have made CreateConfig method async. But, wanted to understand the concept better exactly on why Task.Run() doesn't create any problems.
@KrunalModi ConfigureAwait(false) only configures the continuations to use the threadpool, not the invocation of Client.CreateDocumentAsync
@KrunalModi there is no point using ConfigureAwait with an async call that internally has another async call that is not used with ConfigureAwait. ConfigureAwait(false) should be used almost anywhere, and especially in libraries. Only the top level calls (those in the UI Synchronization Context) don't need ConfigureAwait(false) because the continuation should be executed in the UI Synchronization Context. For libraries that don't use ConfigureAwait(false) internally, using await Task.Run(()=> ...) or await Task.Run(()=> ...).ConfigureAwait(false) is a good workaround.
0

Just an observation: i also noticed that doing this will also result in a deadlock

private string Create(Task<Document> task)
{
    var doc = Task.Run(() => task).Result;
    return doc.Id;
}

[HttpPost]
public ActionResult CreateConfig(MyConfig config)
{
     var task = Client.CreateDocumentAsync(CollectionUri, config);
     var id = Create(task).Result;
     return Json(id);
}

So even running things on the thread pool may not be the ultimate solution. It seems an equally import factor to consider is what SynchonizationContext was in effect when the async method's task was created.

Comments

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.