Python function with list

Question

learn python by myself. I made a function for filling list. But I have 2 variants, and I want to discover which one is better and why. Or they both awful anyway I want to know truth.

def foo (x):
    l = [0] * x
    for i in range(x):
        l[i] = i
    return l

def foo1 (x):
    l = []
    for i in range(x):
        l.append(i)
    return l

I would say the second is more idiomatic and can be easily translated to a list-comprehension. But in this particular case you can actually just do list(range(x))... — Tomerikoo
– Tomerikoo, Commented Mar 25, 2020 at 13:42

kederrac · Accepted Answer · 2020-03-25 14:05:01Z

1

from a performance perspective the first version foo is better:

%timeit foo(1000000)
# 52.4 ms ± 1.99 ms per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)
%timeit foo1(1000000)
# 67.2 ms ± 916 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)

but the pythonic way to unpack an iterator in a list will be:

list(range(x))

also is faster:

%timeit list(range(1000000))
# 26.7 ms ± 661 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 10 loops each)

answered Mar 25, 2020 at 14:05

kederrac

17.4k6 gold badges36 silver badges58 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Python function with list

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Linked

Related