Exposing a .Net Class to COM, while it has a Private Generic type member

Question

While studing to the 70-536 exam I faced this question:

You create the following class:

public class HomePage{ 
public StringBuilder currentHeadlines; 
private string welcomMessage; 
Array stockTickers; 
Dictionary<int, string> priorityList; 
}

You need to generate a type library for this class. The type library will be used by unmanaged codes.

What member should you update?

A. private string welcomMessage.

B. public StringBuilder currentHeadlines.

C. Array stockTickers.

D. Dictionary priorityList. (Correct)

Why would be the option D the correct one, once this member is private?

I know that generic types cannot be exposed to com, but I also know that only public members are exposed. Can anyone clarify me?

Hans Passant · Accepted Answer · 2011-09-20 13:05:24Z

2

Right, the correct answer is E. None of the above. For the reason you gave. They were trying to make you see that COM doesn't know anything about generics but fumbled the example. These sample exams always have a huge errata ("bug list"), be sure to dig it up. Here's one, not sure how complete it is. Having less-than-perfect documentation available otherwise models the software engineering profession pretty well.

answered Sep 20, 2011 at 13:05

Hans Passant

946k151 gold badges1.8k silver badges2.6k bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Exposing a .Net Class to COM, while it has a Private Generic type member

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

1 Answer 1

Comments

Your Answer

Sign up or log in

Post as a guest

Related