6
$\begingroup$

Conventions:

$\bullet\ $ Everything is expressed in lightcone coordinates defined as $$\sigma_{\pm}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\sigma_{1}\pm\sigma_{2})$$ $\bullet\ |\sigma_{12}|$ is the distance between two points.

Background:

We are considering string propagation in arbitrary backgrounds. The two-dimensional surface described by the string is the worldsheet whose coordinates are $\sigma$. I need to calculate beta functions when we consider background fields coupled to free theory. In order to do that, I need to extract out the singularity from the expectation values of vertex operators. These singularities are quantified by using a minimum distance cutoff $\epsilon$ in the worldsheet.

Problem

Consider the two-dimensional free field theory action :

$$S=\frac{1}{2\pi\alpha^{'}}\int{d^2\sigma\partial_{+}\eta^{\mu}\partial_{-}\eta_{\mu}}.$$

The propagator is given as $$\left<\eta^{\mu}{(\sigma_{1})}\eta^{\nu}(\sigma_{2})\right>=-\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}\delta^{\mu\nu}\ln{|\sigma_{12}|^{2}}.$$

We will be using point-splitting regularization, where we introduce a minimum distance in the worldsheet, which is $\epsilon$ taken as constant. Therefore, the regularized propagator is given as

$$\left<\eta^{\mu}{(\sigma)}\eta^{\nu}(\sigma)\right>=\left<\eta^{\mu}{(\sigma)}\eta^{\nu}(\sigma+\epsilon)\right>=-\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}\delta^{\mu\nu}\ln{(\epsilon^{2})}.$$

We also have the regularized operator $\left<e^{ik.\eta}\right>$: $$\left<e^{ik.\eta}\right>=\epsilon^{\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}k^2}.$$

Here $\epsilon$ quantifies the singularity that occurs due to self-contraction.

Now I need to calculate $\left<\partial_{+}\eta^{\mu}(\sigma)\ e^{ik.\eta(\sigma)}\right>$. Here both operators are inserted at the same point.

First method: $$\left<\partial_{+}\eta^{\mu}\ e^{ik.\eta}\right>=\frac{1}{ik_{\mu}}\partial_{+}\left<e^{ik.\eta}\right>=\partial_{+}(\epsilon^{\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}k^2})=0.$$

Second method: $$\left<\partial_{+}\eta^{\mu}(\sigma)\ e^{ik.\eta(\sigma)}\right>=\lim_{\sigma_{1}\rightarrow\sigma_{2}}\left<\partial_{+}\eta^{\mu}(\sigma_{1})\ e^{ik.\eta(\sigma_{2})}\right>$$ $$\Rightarrow \lim_{\sigma_{1}\rightarrow\sigma_{2}}(-\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}\frac{ik^{\mu}}{(\sigma_{1}-\sigma_{2})_{+}}\epsilon^{\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}k^2})=-\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}\frac{ik^{\mu}}{\epsilon}\ \epsilon^{\frac{\alpha^{'}}{2}k^2}.$$

In last step we used the fact that minimum distance $\sigma_1$ and $\sigma_2$ can approach is $\epsilon$ and also since $\epsilon$ is infinitesimal, the component of the distance vector is approximated as the distance ($(\delta\vec{x})_{+}\approx|\delta\vec{x}|$)

Now, which of these is the correct result?

$\endgroup$
7
  • $\begingroup$ Both, had you done the first one correctly. Take the OPE, then the derivative, then the limit. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2 at 7:46
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain this a bit more $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 2 at 9:19
  • $\begingroup$ Hi Mars. Are you following a reference? Which page? $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 3 at 3:41
  • $\begingroup$ I need to derive the results in this paper doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(88)90080-9 $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 3 at 4:44
  • $\begingroup$ That paper uses a different notation. That paper from 1988 apparently only has 6 citations. It defines in eqs. (6) & (7) a point-splitting regularization combined with a path integral over fluctuations. $\endgroup$ Commented Jun 4 at 8:39

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.